Paul Krugman of The New York Times in his column today weighs the dos and don'ts of investigating the torture issue and ultimately holding those responsible accountable. This has become a very hot topic after seeming to disappear earlier, mostly because President Obama said he wasn't much interested in dwelling on the past and wanted to move ahead. He now seems to have had a change of heart in large part because of a fierce political debate over whether to investigate or not.
The conservatives, of course, want to move on and sweep it all under the rug. I'm sympathetic to that argument, that you really dont' accomplish much by investigating past misdeeds. And, because there were so many in the Bush administration that could be pretty much a full-time preoccupation of the Obama administration. Unfortunately, they have other problems to solve, the largest of them created by the same Bush administration.
But, there is the statement President Bush made while in office, that "this government does not torture people." That was obviously driven out of a mindset that because your attorneys tell you something isn't torture means it's so. I don't think anyone now believes this to be the case.
Dick Cheney is on a personal crusade to defend the government torture doctrine he helped write. Maybe I'm way off base and these are difficult times, but shouldn't America be better than that? Isn't it really our morale fiber that has made us the strongest nation (not the richest) in the world. Isn't that what real leadership is about -- the ability to acknowledge, examine and admit your mistakes -- and then change your ways?
Is the debate over torture merely politics as some would tell you? Or is it about something bigger, something more fundamental to our values as Americans? I found Krugman's column helpful in sorting this out.
No comments:
Post a Comment